Judge John E. Jones III roundly rejected Behe’s views
In Science, there cannot be a Judge, who judges which scientific theory is right and which one is wrong:
Financial obligations to accurately communicate to core concepts of their field to the public.
who is the judge that decides who is accurately communicates with the public and who is trying to mislead the public? If they think they are themselves are judges, whose opinion cannot be disrupted and final decision that someone is wrong: Sorry, this not science, this not even politics.
In The article, there was no single experimental evidence provided that there are mutations which are constructive.None
if a scientist is financially obligated to support or refute any scientific theory, He is not a scientist. Science is about seeking the truth, without any obligation to the public or the Government. What if Copernicus were financially obligated to pleased the public and his governments, In science there cannot be any obligation, science is done on the basis of academic freedom, not on the basis of funded by federal grants