All teleological arguments are, at their core, claims that P(Life|God) >> P(Life|~God), or at least that P([some feature of the universe]|God) >> P([some feature of the universe]|~God). But the fact is we don’t know nearly enough about either nature or God to be able to reliably calculate P(X|God) or P(X|~God). For this reason, I don’t think any teleological arguments support the existence of God. Even if it could be shown that evolution is utterly false, it wouldn’t help support the hypothesis of creation (though I don’t believe evolution and creation are contradictory anyway).