I am not among those, if they exist, who worship the Shroud. I simply see in it an exciting artifact from a scientific, historical and religious point of view that provoques human intelligence. In short, a very intriguing artifact.
And I note that this conversation on the Shroud, which already totals more than 350 interventions, contradicts what some here are trying to make people believe, namely that it is a rather banal object that deserves little attention. Somewhat ironic, isn’t it?
1 Like
No, this conversation doesn’t do any such thing. It demonstrates that people who believe the shroud is a banal object, are prepared to resist publicly the sensationalist claims of those who believe it is authentic. Look at who started this thread; it wasn’t me, or anyone else who thinks the shroud is banal.
2 Likes