Ok. Thanks. You saved me a lot of time having to go back through your comments.
So how do you explain Paul’s letters since they are dated first Pauline epistles - Wikipedia
Also, what parts of the book of Acts do you accept? Because if you think it sort of just came about over time, then you have to decide which parts of the history of Acts is fake because it can’t be true. Then also decide when the Book of Acts was fabricated and how the church did it and why they had it addressed to a specific person as they did with the gospel according to Luke.
Explain Polycarp’s letter and how it was able to include so many quote from the New Testament if the stories were embellished over time, they needed more time to circulate around when there was no internet or cars. 
Here’s a translation with references in the text, so you can see the breadth of quotes included. CHURCH FATHERS: Epistle to the Philippians (Polycarp)
This one has the text references at the bottom so may be easier to read. https://www.agape-biblia.org/literatura/PolycarpToPhilippians.pdf
Again, explain how if these stories were embellished over time we don’t have any accounts of the apostles saying, oops, not worth it guys. Is there anyone calling it out, saying - hey that contradicts something else I heard about Jesus while they were swapping stories? Do you see contradictions in the gospels? If it took a while, someone’s memory is going to go bad. Who are the best candidates for putting them together? Polycarp claimed to know John, maybe it’s him or John. But then who wrote Paul’s letters and how did churches begin in those places they’re addressed to?