Tour and Sanford on Genetic Entropy with Time Stamps

[Rumraket (Mikkel R.)]

@Timothy_Horton

Tell us again why any scientist should waste time publishing a peer-reviewed paper refuting Sanford’s YEC claims when Sanford never published the claims in any peer-reviewed paper to start with? Do you also think scientists should spend time publishing peer-reviewed papers refuting a Flat Earth?

Because then they can use that as an apologetic tool. See how busy scientists are responding to us? It’s because we’re really important and right, and they’re really worried. Check all my citations!

ID-creationists are doing this even with posts written on this forum:

@Giltil

Regarding your quite insulting characterization of gpuccio’s argument, may I recall you that he has been invited, over a year ago, and with all the honors due to his rank, to present his argument on this blog. That a thread for scholars has even been devoted to him. And that the most eminent scholars of this community have exchanged several hundreds post with him, trying to understand and refute his argument. Now, do you really think that gpuccio would have sparked so much interest on this blog if what he says was pure nonsense?

Look at this. “Scholars” here with qualifications actually bothered to respond to Gpuccio? This non-stop credentials game is getting exceedingly boring and predictable.