Regarding your quite insulting characterization of gpuccio’s argument, may I recall you that he has been invited, over a year ago, and with all the honors due to his rank, to present his argument on this blog. That a thread for scholars has even been devoted to him. And that the most eminent scholars of this community have exchanged several hundreds post with him, trying to understand and refute his argument. Now, do you really think that gpuccio would have sparked so much interest on this blog if what he says was pure nonsense?