Welcome to Terrell Clemmons: Questions on Methodological Naturalism

[cwhenderson (Curtis Henderson)]

@terrellclemmons

Does anyone else have an observation or comment about this?

No doubt, there is a lot of resistance to bad scientific arguments made by ID. But @Winston_Ewert received (in my mind, at least) a very fair hearing on his hypothesis at work. It may be a considerable time investment, but here is a good link if you want to see more:

Winston Ewert: The Dependency Graph of Life

An interesting and signficant article was published at the Discovery Institute, by @Winston_Ewert : The Dependency Graph of Life, DOI: 10.5048/BIO-C.2018.3. [NOTE: This thread has special rules; read and follow them or there will be consequences] This article is being drummed up by a past interlocutor of @vjtorley and myself (@Cornelius_Hunter) here on this forum thread: It has always been known that the common descent model fails, both from a long list of particular examples, as well as in systematic studies. But what might a better model be? Winston Ewert’s new paper (http://bio-complexity.org/ojs/index.php/main/article/view/BIO-C.2018.3 11) presents a dependency graph model, inspired by computer science. The paper uses model selection methods, and shows that the dependency graph model is a far superior model compared to common descent. New Paper Demonstrates Superiority of Design Model - Scientific Evidence - The BioLogos Forum I thought it would be worth discussing this in …