What about Noah and Population Genetics?

[anon46279830]

I also welcome you @Otto, and yours is the kind of question I have often said must be addressed no matter what happens with Genealogical Adam.

The Good Doctor has sent you to a thread showing the scientific case that there was no bottleneck of two in any time which reasonably comports with Adam and Eve, and the same kind of data will also rule out a more recent bottleneck of a single Y-Chromosome from Noah. None of this contradicts scripture, but it contradicts what a lot of people thought was in the scriptures. The Christ-Centered framework for Early Genesis shows there is no conflict between what the genetic data says and what the scriptures say.
…

Why the Bible Teaches a Framework for Genesis which is Consistent with GA

Apparently I could have made things a little easier on myself if I had started here by posting the video below. It says “the Bible Does not Teach that Adam is the Sole Father of the Human Race”. It is speaking genetically, not in terms of “falleness” or a spiritual version of “dark energy” or whatever one might call the trait which Joshua means when he speaks of Adam as the “sole progenitor.” In fact, the framework laid out in the video below has been called “the heart of Genealogical Adam” (GA) by another member of this forum… I thought so as well. When I came here I thought that this material was supplying the scriptural/theological framework which could support GA. And I don’t just mean the Genealogical Adam view of Adam. The GA model requires the flood to have been one which did not wipe out all of mankind either. This is because Joshua’s work in science says that the human race was not recently bottlenecked down to a single Y-chromosome as the traditional view, or even the RT…