Hello, welcome to the forum…I am not really the welcome wagon, I haven’t posted in a long time. I have noticed however, that the use of the term “scholarly consensus” is a way to whitewash the writers belief. As a believer and a student of the bible, I find that the chronology you present is not accurate. I would encourage further biblical study. I also cringe when people insist that the gospels are not eyewitness accounts. Matthew and John were Apostles, Mark was Peter’s scribe, Luke was a scientist seeking facts within a relatively short historical period. Jesus walked the earth for 40 days prior to transfiguration. Paul’s encounter was with the transfigured Christ and was not the first encounter. Much of what you present is not biblically accurate, publishing dates rarely reflect a chronological account of events. Relying on “scholarly” efforts of non-believers also rarely reveals any truth.