When a Scientist Believes Data Does Not Support Theory in Climate Models, What Then?

[Roy (30-year veteran)]

@Eddie

That’s not “Eddie’s position.” His position is that scientific debate ought to be about data and the interpretation of data, about hypotheses and means of confirming or disconfirming them, and that political partisanship […], arguments from authority, ad hominem arguments, etc. should have no place, either in science itself, or in public policy debates that concern scientific matters.

@Eddie

Look under the hood, for the list of the “Team” which produces the articles on that site. Of the 30 or so writers, the majority don’t hold a PhD in any science at all, and almost none of them has a PhD in climate science or anything close to it… [rest of extensive credentialism omitted]

@Eddie, some-one has hacked your account.