Who is Responsible for Misrepresenting Scientific Findings?

If these built-in mechanisms have role in evolution (as recent data show), then they can easily fit with a design/creation view. Because it obviously supports the idea that organisms are designed to evolve.

You might now argue: couldn’t these built-in mechanisms themselves have arisen through standard darwinian processes (I mean, chance mutations plus fixation)? That’s why I wondered: without these built-in systems, what creative power does evolution really have? Could it have guided a simple self-replicating molecule all the way to the first modern cells?
If you have the time, please read this thread. There, I explain why I believe design is the most reasonable explanation for how the first modern-type cells appeared.