Why PDPrice is YEC, not YGC

It’s more akin to confirmation bias regarding naturalism, reminiscent of the question about irrational numbers like the square root of 2.

Every number that could be nicely described during the time of the ancient Greeks was a ratio of two integers, it was heretical to think there could be irrational numbers, until there was proof-by-contradiction that demonstrated the square root of 2 was irrational.

What has happened that if we assume for the sake of argument every phenomenon is natural (as in the consequence of ordinary mechanisms) we get absurdities or incongruities with accepted ordinary mechanisms. This is akin to proof-by-contradiction, but perhaps it is better stated as argument-by-contradiction.

This was unwittingly stated by Brenner which I describe in this thread. The went from the origin of life appearing to be solved in the Urey-Miller experiment era to the present state of affairs described here:

Naturalism is has practically failed for the origin of life, it is failing for the origin of eukaryotes, it’s failing for the origin of meiosis. It’s not hard to see, practically every major step in the claims of evolutionary biologists will require miracles indistinguishable from special and/or progressive creationism. That’s hardly a triumph for naturalism.