William Lane Craig's Science of Cosmology

[Patrick]

@swamidass

W. L. Craigs cosmological argument is a great example of at least science-engaged philosophy (and perhaps theology too). He is engaging real science faithfully (as far as I know), but then reasoning about it with options and rules that go beyond science. That is a legitimate activity, as far as I can tell, as long as he is accurately representing science. As far as I know, he is to the best of his ability.

Yes, it is science engaged philosophy. He is engaging real science faithfully BUT he then gets the mathematicians upset by getting the logic wrong in his Kalam cosmological argument.

https://www.scientificexploration.org/forum/the-kalam-cosmological-argument-debunked