Common Design Theory, Revisited

[colewd (Bill Cole)]

@Meerkat_SK5

Do you have any other issues you need me to clarify or expound upon? It will be greatly appreciated.

I don’t think you need to go beyond identifying that the observation indicates a conscious mind is the mechanism. If you look at general relativity as a benchmark matter is the mechanism. How matter does this is beyond the scope of the theory,

@Meerkat_SK5

No, it is not advocating for universal common ancestry. It is advocating for universal common design that naturally simulates common ancestry because the designer is using the same mechanism to achieve the same purposes for every animal. What made you think otherwise from reading my article? Or were you referring to specifically phylogenetic patterns?

I am saying that you are advocating for individually designed “kinds” vs common ancestry. I think we are on the same page here.

@Meerkat_SK5

I don’t view them as the same kind, but two separate created kinds.

Ok so how did you determine this? If you can generate a reasonable standard for determining this that would be a huge step forward.

I would agree the chromosome difference is an indication of separate kinds.