How to Describe Swamidass

[swamidass (S. Joshua Swamidass)]

@swamidass

So, if you are interested, I can explain what the current frameworks are and why they are not sensible. I can explain the framework I have been using, and how secular scientists and other Christian scientists have responded to it.

If we go down this path, I’m hoping that we can keep focused on understanding this first, before we go elsewhere. That means keeping responses short, and questions on task, until I get out the bulk of this. Perhaps it would be better if I started another thread? What do you think? Should I go on, or save it for later?

@Jordan

Yes, yes, yes!

I am very interested in this. I think this is a big deal, especially for the Church and emerging adults. I know a lot of scientists aren’t crazy about philosophy but I think there are some real areas of conflict that arise from this lack of sensible framework.

@Mlkluther

Please go on. This may help me put a few more of the puzzle pieces together I have floating around.

Seems there is interest in this, but it is getting swallowed up by a far more wordy dialogue between @Chris_Falter and @Eddie. I am going to start a new thread to discuss this. This new thread will have some rules that I expect everyone to follow.