First I have read your 2007 critique of the ID use of Doug Axe’s work that I thought was highly useful. There were a couple of comments you made in the discussion that I disagreed with, and one which contradicts your 2003 panda’s thumb article.
Your claim that the ubiquitin system doesn’t look designed because of the destruction of proteins as a mechanism.
That there is very little or no information content in proteins. Your 2003 article shows a range of significant information content in proteins.