I’m going to try really hard to forget that picture (shudder).
I looked for your comment that came to my Email but It wasn’t here. I guess the glut of funny looking things I would have liked to see was the process of in this case, of the fish with teeth with no enamel, then with some enamel and then maybe something like the fish heads teeth and then ones more effective… (disregarding the reason for them to slowly go this way or that) would expect that DNA had just copied wrong or additional DNA was added some how and Teeth got added to the fish in some primary form and then more info was put into the DNA and boom, there was better teeth… And for this sort of process to be observable. Like ears starting to form and noses taking shape… One would think you would see the changes between a fish and a turtle or whatever and between a horse and a moose… or whatever the line of variation looked like, and not for them to be living today as they are fully formed. The diversity should be so great that even today you would expect to see horses getting ears shaped as they are and some getting longer legs. maybe some with front legs a foot shorter than back legs. IF DNA had eyes maybe I would expect something more organized… But I expect a lot of half baked unorganized species way beyond the organized species we have like angler fish and star fish etc.
Well obviously your personality hasn’t evolved to be kind. Your weakness of character to take shots at people shows that you are not as evolved or able to defend your position and cant perceive the valid points of others and find them as a attack.
I am here because I was invited by a email sent out to everyone.
My points are valid, and There is hard science proving All 7 billion people are from one single line of DNA and that we are really very much like a race from Adam and Eve.
YES, I think we need to prove evolution by having the DNA from the ancestors not from modern day species… And I think that is a reasonable ask. Sort of like looking through your bank records to prove where the money came out for the phone bill… That to me would be a smoking gun of sorts.
And No I am not “more ignorant” I am not ignorant at all. I see what many don’t. This is unrelated but is a easy example of how people assume things without seeing what is in front of them.
E=MC2… its a grift. You cant multipy oranges and apples to make spades… You cant multiply mass in Kilo’s with Squared light speed in meters per second What if the meter was 4ft long… then the 300,000 would be a smaller number and when you square it it would add up to a different amount of Joules. Albert pulled a fast one on the Scientific community and they some how didn’t grasp it… Joules came out with joules around the same time… Maybe they colluded on it… worked it… but why light… once you square it the number has nothing to do with light… Unless you could say there was a reason squaring it was a function of motion that caused the amount of energy to be such… The point being the actual Equation should be E=M900,000,000 OR possibly E=1KG of mass times 1Billion. approx… I personally didn’t measure the blast of a nuke or measured how much of the nuke exploded to quantify it… But what it really appears to be is a Kiss my royal rear end by Albert… Multiply a KG of mass by a billion and you will get approx the amount of energy in Joules. It never had anything to do with light and it just happened that light squared equaled an approximate number.
You cant just assume that since we look a bit like a monkey that our DNA is the same or that we have common ancestors etc. There has been far to much fraud in Science in this area to just take peoples word for it.
I’m sort of in awe of this and the bit that follows. You actually are under the impression that physicists are so bad at mathematical reasoning that they’ve failed to frame both sides of an equation in terms of compatible units, and that nobody in physics is good enough at math to have yet noticed. Square metres per second squared is a measurement of acceleration. Multiply that by mass and what do you have? A measure of energy. And so long as you keep the units consistent, this will work even if you measure mass by ounces Troy, time by fortnights, and distance by fathoms; the trick is that you then need to employ a unit which measures E in the same terms.
6 Likes
Thats what we do see in the fossil record. By their very nature, phylogenetic trees are constructed using the presence/absence and coding of morphological characteristics, so when you see extinct organisms in a stem group of a living lineage, that indicates the process of character evolution towards the extant state. Thats what “transitional fossils” are.
Why? That’s not how evolution works. A “half-baked” animal like a horse with front legs drastically shorter than the back legs is unlikely to survive, much less become established as a new species. Evolution is much more gradual than that. Every species along an evolutionary lineage is “organised”. If you travelled back in time to the Devonian, you wouldn’t see “half-baked” animals - it’s only with the benefit of hindsight that we can say "ah this fossil is transitional between fossil X that came before and fossil Y or living species Z that came after.
4 Likes
Pick one.
6 Likes
Remember that the ignorant are often quite arrogant, as you are. Everything you have said here shows that you know nothing of biology, and the several professional biologists here (me among them) have noticed that. I see by this post that you also know nothing about physics, though I’m not a professional physicist.
This is your ignorance of biology talking again. The data in question are not “we look a bit like a monkey”. Do you know what a nested hierarchy is?
And aren’t Christians supposed to be humble? Isn’t this arrogant celebration of your own ignorance the opposite of humble?
3 Likes
Yes, I am saying it… My way of saying it may be a bit jumbled in its presentation, but You got it. this Idea that it is a famous invention or discovery is bogus… lets say its accurate. Whats accurate is the number 900,000,000. The real invention or genus is the hard work of those who made the periodic table. What really is mass if its measured by a Kilogram, which it really isn’t about weight because of gravity but mass and the force needed to move it. I am no math genus, but I can see when someone is selling snake oil. squaring the speed of light? nonsense. Its no longer light… fits the number and if that number is measured in Ft per second, then the whole thing is botched.
What I am saying is people cant see what is in front of their nose.
Everything survives till it doesn’t… T-Rex. you could say, look the legs, they caused its eventual death… but if it survived till then, then those legs would be fine… so if a horse had short front legs it would be fine. But it sure is a coincidence that Evolution made them both just right. You just never see birds with their wings upside down… funny how that is…
OK, now I have to wonder if this person has recently gone off, or perhaps on, some kind of medication.
No, that’s wrong. If you change how you measure speed to feet per second, then you must change the units for energy to units which are founded upon feet and seconds, or add conversion factors to your math to adjust for the change in units. If consistent units are used, the math will always work because E=MC^2 is a fact about the underlying physics, not just an artifact of the use of particular units.
You might want to consider this: the discipline of physics is immensely, profoundly math-driven. A physicist understands the importance not only of having your math right but also of being sure that the results of that math are descriptive of real aspects of the world, not just artifacts of the way in which the math was done. The error you think you see here, if it were real, would be a boneheaded mistake of the most obvious kind. Nobody with a decent command of mathematics could fail to see it. And so if Einstein had made such an error, generations of physicists after him, each physicist himself highly literate in the relevant math, could not possibly go on repeating it. Ten minutes after Einstein made that mistake, he’d have been corrected by one of his colleagues, and that’d be the end of that. But it’s not a mistake. E really does equal MC squared, in real terms, regardless of what system of units is used to describe E, M and C; the only thing is that the units used must be consistent.
In other words: when you think that you have understood the math of fundamental physics better than any of the physicists or the mathematicians who work with the math of physics have, the overwhelming likelihood is that you’ve misunderstood.
2 Likes
Maybe he just has short front legs or upside down wings.
3 Likes
the other side of the equation is in Joules. the total amount of heat no matter how its measured has to be the same. You would have to invent lets say Trumpkins and then make it work to mean the amount of energy your new measurement was. So lets say rather than 900,000,000 it could be 42, but then 1 KG x 42 would equal 42 Trumpkins which would be the same amount of energy as 900,000,000 Joules. so 1 Trumpkin = 21,428,571 Joules. ( I am so sorry to have tossed in this off topic point about people not seeing what was in front of them. )
Thanks for that. LoL. Its called out of the box thinking… the solution is to fly upside down. Like the back stroke. LoL.
XD
How did you go in high school mathematics or physics?
Dimensional analysis
The kinetic energy released in a car crash is not different based on wether you measure car speed in mph or kph.
KE = 1/2 * mv^2
The gravitational potential energy of a fall from a roof is not dependent on whether you measured the height of the roof in metres or feet.
PE = mgh
You can measure m, v, g, h in whatever units you like. Both the kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy formulas still hold true in any unit of measurement.
5 Likes
No. Rendering the units consistent doesn’t just mean tweaking them to make the result come out right. Joules, for example, are a metric unit, so need to correspond to the appropriate metric units on the other side. If you change the units on the one side to anything else – say, furlongs per fortnight for the speed of light and “stone” for mass, you then would need either to apply conversion factors to the terms to conform them to metric or you’d need to name a new unit of energy which arises from the same underlying units of furlongs, fortnights and stone. But once you define that unit, for which I propose the name Fonebone after the physicist of the same name, the same underlying reality will be as correctly described in furlongs, fortnights, stone and Fonebones as is currently described in meters, seconds, grams and Joules. The scale of the units can be wholly arbitrary, so long as that arbitrary unit is used consistently for all quantities (and, where required, in the definitions of the other units) in the equation.
P.S. – I posted this before seeing @Witchdoc’s post above. The Wikipedia piece on dimensional analysis, as well as his other remarks, are exactly right.
1 Like
I did really well in physics and Math. I cant spell or go grammar unfortunately, but my humor and good looks make up for it.
And yes, measure as you like but if the number changes on one side of the equation then the other side will be wrong. I guess then we can thank God for E=MC2 because he master minded the whole thing to have Joules make his units as the were and to make meters as they were. What glorious luck or providence.
you know I would hope someone along the way would look up when Joules invented Joules and start some actual meaningful investigation… Again, to look at a problem scientifically pulling it apart.
And my original point is with this, People cant see how fake Evolution is cause they cant see it. they look around the world, they see these fossil layers but never contemplate, how is it that each continent has all these layers and where were these layers during the same time period. And at what feet above sea level are they now. And, do land animals live in any of these layers. They do not see what is in front of them and assume false assumptions. They don’t bother to dig into E=mc2 or Evolution or anything. They bicker.