Side Comments on Ann Gauger's Response to Themelios Review

[Patrick]

@swamidass

There are interesting things coming to the surface here, but it bears emphasizing that I had only 2,000 words to address a 1,007 page book, 2 words per page. This is just the opening part of an ongoing conversation. It is to be expected that I did not deal with every point in the review, and leave many questions unanswered.

I’ll be reaching out to @Agauger, and if there is interest, I’ll be publishing my next entry in this exchange in the coming weeks.

Why do you waste your time with such nonsense? It seems so beneath you to even be reviewing such a book in the first place and then commenting on 10 articles by Ann Gauger commenting on your comments. Now you are commenting on the comments made on the comments made on a totally unless nonsensical book of TE where nobody has a clue on what TE is or isn’t. Why don’t you continue to concentrate on doing real evolutionary science for the benefit of real people?