Side Comments on "Liar, Lunatic, or Lord"

[Tim]

@Tim

@heymike3

If I said there is an infinite being, but not an infinite number of things, are you able to consider the philosophy behind this statement?

These appear to be two bald assertions, not a philosophical argument.

@heymike3

@Tim

Therefore it would seem obvious that the bald assertion of Acts 2:36 has zero apologetic value.

But there’s an argument being used there, irrespective of what skepticism you can attach to the text, it’s the argument I am looking at.

WHAT “argument”?

All you have provided to date is three assertions – two of your own, and one attributed to Peter by Acts.

An argument generally requires premises and a conclusion.

The Bible says it. I believe it. That settles it.

… may be a bad argument, but at least it is an argument – 2 premises, one conclusion.

What you have presented so far is not even that.