Why is it undeserved topic?
Underserved, not undeserved. āNot adequately served.ā
Fine with me. Iām āwhiteā. Iām evangelical. Iām way past 50. Iām male. And Iām a Christian. So letās start with me. Does the negative implication you are making apply?
But you are a nice secular humanist like me and Dr. Swamidass. I am not talking about you as you are one of us. I am talking about them, those not nice people.
āSecular humanistā has ambiguous confusing denotations and connotations. So I would never apply that label to myself (for risk of being misunderstood) even though I do endorse the best goals of actual (not skewed) secularism and I love humanity and wish to improve the welfare of humanity.
Of course, āniceā white evangelical, over-50, Christian men like me are not at all rare.
@patrick I think @AllenWitmerMiller is a Christian secular humanist or an Evangelical secular humanist like you think of me. You canāt drop āChristianā and āEvangelicalā for it to work with us.
I think it is far more likely for @AllenWitmerMillerās tribe to grow if we donāt besmirch a whole demographic category. After all, we donāt hold your whiteness against you .