Very good.
Now, see if you can find any respected researchers who object to RFK Jr’s actions as Health Secretary. I’ m sure you can if you look hard enough.
I don’t doubt that many respected researchers do object to RFK jr’s decision. Conversely, I don’t doubt that many respected researchers approve it. But I am pretty sure no respected researcher approve the decision to destroy the bio samples of the QoVax study.
I do. Well, unless you include people who are respected by ignorant dumbbells.
1 Like
Yes, I missed that, for which I apologise. But my wider point remains. If this is of of genuinely “exceptional scientific and medical value”, why is it only a single Covid loon making a ruckus over it (over and over again), and why is the only on-point quote supporting this contention from its former project lead?
Also, if this of such “exceptional scientific and medical value” why has it produced little, if anything, in the way of of high impact research – apparently only the MDPI article I linked to above, and another unpublished article?
1 Like
Nope. Vaccines can and often do prevent infection, but many don’t. You would know this if you spent any time educating yourself instead of stuffing yourself with bullshit.
In the case of the COVID vaccines, I believe that the vaccine and boosters provide infection protection for up to 3 months, then reduce severe disease risk for months beyond that. This information is available to anyone who can read.
You apparently can’t understand that tossing lies into the faces of other people, especially people who know more than you do, is one of the most disrespectful things a person can do to another person. Somehow you have lost the ability to respect others. Maybe you were born this way, maybe you were raised this way, or maybe your human decency was eroded by your infection with a virus more dangerous than all the coronaviruses combined. A virus of the mind.
For my part, I am summoning the self-respect to stop conversing with you.
1 Like
How do you know?
Rather than this pathetic appeal to quotes, please provide us what the reasons to think these samples are “globally significant”, are supposed to be. Not “MD Professor Dr. Schmidt, PhD says so”.
Does no other country hold similar sample collections, have similar research not already been done on those? What’s so special about these?
There are thousands of reasons why already collected samples might be discarded, and millions are discarded every day all over the worlds hospitals and resarch institutes. Ranging from lack of freezer space, different budget allocation, through you’re unlikely to learn something new from these, to political, legal, and so on.
The idea that the only rational explanation we have for the destruction of this collection is that politicians (from opposing political parties) are afraid of what the data will reveal even before the research has been conducted, is a complete fiction. Do you have any actual evidence that this is the case?
1 Like