The Meaning of The Genesis Kinds

Theology

(S. Joshua Swamidass) #1

Can you give us a link to that article?


Concordism and Genesis 1-2
(Kenneth Turner) #2

I don’t know if it’s available online. But here’s a link to the journal on Google Books: https://books.google.com/books?id=8wpMAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3&dq=kenneth+turner+kinds+origins+min+todd+wood&source=bl&ots=hObrtc8Xrx&sig=6idRbWu8ivFuD-TKLK05SGyOfYg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjhrruUi83cAhUSw1kKHX8RBZkQ6AEwAHoECAIQAQ#v=onepage&q=kenneth%20turner%20kinds%20origins%20min%20todd%20wood&f=false

Mind you, this was my first jump into the discussion. Todd Wood knew I would represent a position that did not supported his baraminology. So I commend him for letting me say waht I wanted to. Funny, this article has been referenced on AiG, making me think the author didn’t actually read the article, but just assumed if it’s in a YEC journal it must agree!

I have a PDF of the article. Any way to attach that?


(S. Joshua Swamidass) #3

Have you seen this article by a Seventh Day Adventist?

http://www.atsjats.org/publication/view/39

I wonder if it is best translated as “many kinds.”


(Kenneth Turner) #4

I haven’t. Thanks for the heads up. The problem with “many kinds” is that the Hebrew construction [“according to its kind”] is awkward for something this simple. I’ll take a look, though I was about to jump into the Dabar paper!

KJ


(S. Joshua Swamidass) #5

Dabar paper first! :smile:


(system) automatically bumped #6

(S. Joshua Swamidass) closed #7