The molecular evolution of feathers with direct evidence from fossils

Science
(Dave Carlson) #1
1 Like
Brian Miller: Co-option and Irreducible Complexity
(S. Joshua Swamidass) #2

Very cool interaction between biochemistry and fossils. Thanks.

1 Like
(Robert Byers) #3

There was no dinosaur bird transition. There were no dinosaurs. These tyupes were birds misidentified.
Fossils never show evidence for biology. they are , by definition, after the facxt of biiological processes. Therefore its only a guess that this fossil led to that one by a hidden biological process that is called evolution. You can’t get biology out of a stone.
All they can do here is observe feather types and guess if they evolved from here to there.
"must of been’ sounds like bias by the way. Its corrupting investigation.

#4

LOL - because @Robert_Byers says so.

1 Like
(T J Runyon) #5

:joy::joy::joy::joy::joy:

1 Like
(Robert Byers) #6

Well not biological processes which is how fossil;s are used by evolutionists.
They only show aFTER THE FACT of biological processes. any process could only be inferred from connecting facts/data of fossils.
Thats why fossils are not biological scientific evidence for evolution. Its sloppy rsearch on the part of evolutionists.

(T J Runyon) #7

Would you like to come to the lab sometime?

3 Likes