Continuing the discussion from Literal Interpretations and the Genealogical Adam:
Christy, at BioLogos asks @gbrooks9 for evidence that YEC and OEC leaders care about a Genealogical Adam (Were we defending Evolution?, not Hermeneutics 'Per Se'? - Open Forum - The BioLogos Forum). The implication is that no one cares. This is false. It was a key discussion point at the Dabar Conference (Adventures in New Places —Ann Gauger on the Dabar Conference).
Of course, she could just ask us here, but BioLogos is not big on dialogue now days. Regardless, here are four examples: