Cool. Call us when you find such a watch then.
You donāt get the point. There is not such thing as Nothing. There has to be Something.
But we are not watches, no matter what you may believe about what image we are made in. A watch might be useful as an analogy for communicating your beliefs and philosophy, but it it isnāt useful as a scientific explanation or as a piece of evidence for a reasoned argument.
That something is God. He even made you possibility in the following ways.
- Young Earth Creation
- Old Earth Creation
- ID Creationism
- ID Evolution
This is beneath me. Iām out.
Nothing can create nothing.
Watch is a technology (meaning, not biology) we know was designed by human beings. Humans (and other animals) are biological structures. Now, donāt get me wrong, Iām not going against your belief in Creator that created the universe. Iām going against your bad arguments for such a Creator.
Really? Really? Youāre an old man, stop acting like a bloody five year old.
I am not acting like a five year old, but you are acting like Bart Simpson!
So neither is known for its prowess in biology research. A simple ānoā would have been sufficient.
Thatās nice, but how is that important in the context of your claiming to be an authority in biology?
Mine? No, evolutionary biology is much more than Darwin. Thatās covered in detail elsewhere on this site; you might want to learn something. My position is that God created through evolution, btw.
Would you say that what you wrote reflects that you are a faithful follower of the most fundamental teaching of Jesus Christ?
Color me impressed! Iām still not understanding how anything youāve bragged about makes you an authority on biology, though.
wrong again. Not a theist.
So are you saying that God isnāt something?
I really did get your goat. My schools are fine and my undergraduate school in next to Harvard. You are a worm brain. If I do not wish to like Charles Robert Darwin, that is more affair. Did you know that Charles and I both descend from the Wessex Royal family. You may want to read this. It was written by my late cousin, Professor Alf Mapp. Here is a quote from the editors.
Alf Mapp, Jr. was a professor of history, literature, and Western civilization at Old Dominion University. His writings, including the Virginia Experiment and Frock Coats and Epaulets, have been published in nine languages and have earned him Freedoms Foundation Honor Medal, a Pulizer nomination and numerous American and British citations. As a journalist he cover Presidents Truman, Eisenhower and Premier Churchill. He was a direct descendant of King Alfred the Great of England.
I still feel that cousin Charles was a monkey brain, just a little higher on the tree than you if there is one. Oh, age does show wisdom. Oh, my first cousin, Walter Drane of Georgia, is a physician. There are others in my family. Charles Darwin was NOT a scientist, he was a student of medicine, which he never pursued and a theologian.
Why arenāt any of the creationists here making any attempt to set Charles Miller straight on the facts, and why is nobody flagging his insults?
@swamidass, @John_Harshman, @Mercer
It seems I am the one that has been insulted here many times. The ones who have should be flagged by me.
What have I written that is an insult, specifically?
A great deal. An example: an old man acting like a five you old child. You insulted my universities and my education. Anything else.
Youāll have to translate that second clause to English, Iām afraid.
More Christian behavior. What does āthat is more affairā mean?
No, and youāre not explaining how thatās relevant. As a geneticist, I do know that the Royals are dangerously inbred.
Read what? You didnāt post anything written by your cousin.
How does any of that relate to your opinions on biology, exactly?
I didnāt write that. You need to retract your false accusation.
No, questioning their relevance to your claims about biology is not an insult. Calling you āworm brainā would be an insult, but Iām not the one doing that.
That was me.
Although, not in such words.
so what if the watch will be made from organic components like living things? in this case you will conclude design or a natural process?