\
So this was a conspiracy among scientists?
So the improvements in our understanding of neanderthals was due to “smarter people” studying the bones? Don’t you think the discovery of additional evidence had something to do with it? Is the advance of science due to ever smarter people becoming scientists? Or is scientific progress due to new evidence being examined and peer-review within the science academy accumulating ever increasing understanding of our world?
In any case, earlier in that same paragraph, you said that “There were no neanderthals.” If there were no neanderthals, how could there be any bones to study?
It appears from your posts on various threads that you object to scientists putting labels on things, whether those labels be neanderthals or even taxonomy groups like mammals and reptiles. I don’t understand why you have so many objections to labels.