Which of 2 scenarios better appeals to Creationists?

Conversation Side Conversation
, ,
1

Continuing the discussion from Welcome rtmcdge:

@rtmcdge ,

Which position or argument (below) seems more believable?:

Disclaimer Note:
This is a request for a comparison; finding one more believable is not equal to saying it is your belief.

[1] it is not necessary for God to exist to explain the origin of life on Earth. Evolution and physics, without any divine direction is sufficient to explain Earth’s living things.

[2] by faith, i accept the idea that God is the ultimate designer of Creation, but other than a few one-off miracles, i see God as using natural processes (including evolution) to effect and manipulate His Creation?

Do you somewhat favor [1] or [2]???

2

You understand that the person you’re addressing has been gone for over half a year, right?

2 Likes
3

@john_harshman,

My in-box was festooned with “welcome” postings.

I thank you for letting me know.