Dan Graur on Lents’s “Human Errors”

[cwhenderson (Curtis Henderson)]

Dan has some strong words of praise for “Human Errors” by our own @NLENTS. Since he will likely not post this himself, I’ll do it for him

[NLENTS (Nathan H. Lents)]

Thanks, Curtis! Dan can be really cantankerous, so this is extra appreciated from him! lol

[Mung]

I don’t recall the book discussing the flaws in the human genome and “that our genome is flawless” appears to be a straw-man. Who actually believe the human genome is flawless? Who actually believes that the human genome is flawed? I don’t think that science can tell us that.

[swamidass (S. Joshua Swamidass)]

What a great argument against Darwin Devolves @mung.

[Mung]

Be sure to bring it up when you talk to Jonathan McLatchie and give me credit!