Well…actually, there is a joke about this. Supposedly he attempted to make this for a popular audience…he failed. Badly. It is a solidly academic book.
Would you agree @NLENTS ?
Would I agree about what?
That WLC’s Adam and Eve book is an academic tome, not well suited for popular audiences (except the fact WLC has a large popular following).
1 Like
I will remind readers that this thread is about Ken Ham’s “newest book Creation to Babel: A Commentary for Families” (as per the thread’s title and the link in the OP).
“WLC’s Adam and Eve book” is therefore entirely off-topic (except perhaps to the extent that somebody wants to make a comparison between the two).
The Ham book is described as a " Family Devotional & Commentary" and therefore quite clearly is “aimed at a popular rather than a scholarly audience.”
1 Like
@tim you’re right. I got threads mixed up and thought that your comment was about WLC’s book. It isn’t.
My apologies :).
Easy enough to lose track which thread you’re on, on here, at times. 
3 Likes
Right, that’s why I was confused. I was like, “You think I read the Ken Ham book???” lol
3 Likes
I was quite concerned that Josh was labeling Ken Ham’s book as “solidly academic”. 
4 Likes
That does seem unlikely. 
This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.