Because of the brevity of your sentence, I can’t tell why you even think I’m discussing Mark’s position in some way that over-sells what Mark is saying.
How about this:
Invoking Jesus as “blah blah something something” with Adam should be pretty generic. And it still qualifies as fairly mystical. Most Christians don’t attempt any unification of the two personalities. Adam is the archetype of flawed humanity, while Jesus is the archetype of perfected humanity.
But as any good historian of medieval Catholicism knows, there’s always room for some additional nuance when it comes to Jesus!