There are issues here especially if one goes with @AllenWitmerMiller interpretation.i.e that human beings who did not descend from Adam do not bear the image of God.
This interpretation necessitates the following -
Someway in which other human beings were inferior to Adam because none of the other human females were found to be suitable companion for him.
Adams calling to have dominion over the earth and all in it which is not given to those who don’t bear the image. Thus leading to two classes of human beings. One to rule and one to be ruled over.
And of course, if Adam was created 5000 years ago… then a lot of ancient civilizations like India Nd China were founded by human beings who do not bear the image of God and are in fact “beasts”.
The above scenario is a natural defence for racism and imperialism.
Yet the irony is that God’s chosen people, the Israelites did not spend much time “dominating” other nations.
This doesn’t strike me as the same story of Adam Paul is talking about in Acts 17.