There were several helpful comments during this meeting. A couple new pieces of information:
BJU is preparing a response to me, which I am told that they will send me directly. I will make it public after I review it.
Though I had not brought my book up at all, the TRACs president had read it, and clarified that the GAE, was consistent with their belief statement, because the GAE is consistent with a historical-grammatical reading of Genesis. This was a very significant statement from them.
TRACs is also making a response, though I do not know if or when it will be given to me. Given TRACs track record here, which has been professional and communicative, I expect they will give me a response, which I will share after review.
Most of the hearing focused on totally different issues, and accordance with their guidelines I was not allowed to ask any questions. However, I had a few very positive chats back and forth with the TRACs president.
(S. Joshua Swamidass)
He also made the statement that he was surprised I named BJU specifically. He also made some important clarifications on their belief statements, and why they require their member organizations to have them.
In his letter, Steve Pettit states that “highly qualified faculty…present evidence for both the young Earth creation and evolutionary models…” I can’t help but wonder who is doing the presenting and exactly what is being presented. Do they bring in a scientist who accepts evolution to present the evidence? I would be surprised if they did, but perhaps I shouldn’t make assumptions. Is the evidence for evolution presented fairly or does the presenter say “here’s what passes for evidence, chuckle chuckle.” I was once asked by an acquaintance if I would give a presentation on YEC at his church. I told him that I would be happy to, but that he should know that I’m not YEC and probably not what he was looking for. He withdrew the invitation. I know that can’t talk about YEC without editorializing. I tell my students that I want them to come to their own conclusions and that they are free to disagree with me, but I don’t hide my views or pretend to be objective.
ETA: My Evangelical university offers the course “Sects and Cults.” Obviously, they are not suggesting students join a cult. Is BJU teaching evolution the same way my university teaches Scientology, as a something wrong and dangerous?
I’ve had the privilege of meeting a couple of their science faculty. I only have positive things to say about them. I hope drawing attention to this would encourage accreditors to advocate for more freedom for them.
I agree. But they brought it up in their response and implied that teaching evolution says something about the quality of their courses. But if they want to make that claim, I would like to know more about what they are teaching and who’s teaching it.
For what it’s worth, I earned a PhD in Molecular Biology without taking a single course in Evolutionary Biology and was a YEC in grad school. I don’t think my research suffered for it and I don’t think studying evolution on my own or changing my YEC beliefs made me a better scientist.