“Razor-sharp precision”? Eddie, you have no clue whether Tour is being precise or not.
Here’s an example of your chemistry acumen:
Meyer’s blatant lie from Signature in the Cell, p. 128:
“A protein within the ribosome known as a peptidyl transferase then catalyzes a polymerization (linking) reaction…”
HHMI Researcher Thomas Steitz Wins Nobel Prize in Chemistry
Thomas A. Steitz, Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, and Ada E. Yonath awarded the 2009 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for studies of the structure and function of the ribosome.
“…it shows unambiguously that the ribosome is a ribozyme because we can see where the substrate binds and there’s no protein atom near enough to that site to produce any catalytic activity.”
Continuing the discussion from Eddie and others on Meyer's books, ID, and creationism:
Confronted with this blatant falsehood, the razor-sharp Eddie simply regurgitates the lie:
I was not referring to the ribosome as a totality, but to peptidyl transferase, which you went on and on about. It’s an enzyme (an aminoacyltransferase enzyme to be exact), and enzymes are proteins, and proteins are biomolecules or macromolecules. My terminology was correct. It’s bad enough that you are a pedant who tries to catch people out on tiny “errors”, but a least you could be an accurate pedant.
There’s also your apparent inability to read/understand the Nick Lane book…