You can’t possibly know whether or not you (or I) misinterpreted Yockey, because you haven’t read the article you’re ‘quoting’ from. You are lying about your sources yet again.
You aren’t quoting from Yockey’s paper. You’re quoting from Charles Thaxton’s book chapter* that quote(mine)s Yockey’s paper, or from some later creationist/ID article that copied directly or indirectly from Thaxton’s book.
Why should anyone care what you say about Yockey’s work when it’s obvious that you haven’t actually read the paper you’re citing?
*This is from 2002, and is the earliest of this form of the quote that I can find **. It’s possible, but unlikely, that @Meerkat_SK5 is actually quoting from an earlier creationist/ID work that Thaxton copied.
** I admit I haven’t searched very hard. I can’t justify the effort.