Thank you for asking, @mercer!
An argument for evolution that I see around quite a bit (and find to be of some interest) is that (apparently), the majority of scientists with expertise in the fields most relevant to origins seem to affirm evolution. Further, evolution is sometimes described as the “scientific consensus.”
Ultimately, being an individual that places a high value on personal inquiry, I think that this would not be a particularly good reason to affirm evolution. I do, however, think it is an interesting (and quick) observation that is worth people’s consideration.
P.S: There always seem to be different scientific arguments and pieces of evidence for evolution being kicked around, but none really come to mind as my “favorite.”